In article <uu2dncnuTugSV4vNnZ2dnUVZ5tGdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
Neville M Wiles <kick.dweeber.ass@taft.sucks.for.sure> wrote:
Actually all he said that they are legal.. and they are until
someone can prove that you bought it after the change over. Just having
one in your car, the original discussion, isn't an automatic bust.
--
America is at that awkward stage. It's too late
to work within the system, but too early to shoot
the bastards."-- Claire Wolfe
In article <abrd18l1g35oc24kklkali3oks2httcm7m@4ax.com>,
Gunner Asch <gunnerasch@gmail.com> wrote:
Just out of personal curiosity, do most magazines have a serial
number of other way to tell that the person wielding the engraver might
have been.. shall we say "creative"?
--
America is at that awkward stage. It's too late
to work within the system, but too early to shoot
the bastards."-- Claire Wolfe
I have no clue. I was less than two weeks from being released from
active duty & on my way home. He did say he was going to have to
requisition a new dental chair, though. Apparently he felt it was too
old, and then too damaged to repair after he finished removing those
teeth.
Most VA doctors give a damn, and try to do the right thing. It's all
the lifer government employees that screw things up. Like any other
system, they can only hire forom the pool of what's availible.
Generally, they aren't legal. In fact, I'm surprised that the law
grandfathered existing ones as of the effective date of the law. If
they can ban the manufacture, sale, importation and transfer of any of
them after that date, then they could just as well have banned them
outright. Note that if someone owning a grandfathered high-cap magazine [Only registered and activated users can see links. ], the estate item cannot lawfully pass to any heir in California.
The liar and dole scrounger, gummer, very definitely was trying to
suggest that high-cap magazines are generally legal in California, and
that's false.